Jessica's Rural Words
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
November 16 2014

Are our rural economies really working?

According to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), there are 505,000 businesses in rural areas – around 28% of all businesses in England.

Rural businesses are just as diverse as those in urban areas and contribute more than £211 billion to the UK economy but many have untapped potential.

With ‘economic growth’ remaining a government top priority, how are rural areas contributing and benefitting from growth? Jessica Sellick investigates.

The rural economy is dominated by entrepreneurs, self-employed people, ‘job jugglers’, home businesses and small and micro enterprises. While many people think of land management industries (e.g. farming, food, forestry) and tourism; in practice the rural economy is multi-layered and multi-local – reaching far beyond this into arts and culture, manufacturing, retail, professional and business services.

The mix of business size, sectors and performance also varies – with some firms likely to be found close to rural towns and others found in sparser areas. All have an important role to play in creating and sustaining employment and safeguarding the future of rural communities. Central government has introduced a range of measures to stimulate rural economic growth – from the Rural Growth Network Pilots to broadband and mobile infrastructure projects and a tourism fund. But what kind(s) of growth are we driving for?

Not all growth is good and not all growth is bad, therefore we need to consider what kinds of potentially valuable growth we want in rural areas (and ‘valuable’ to whom). And are we offering rural residents better opportunities to work in their local communities in this drive for growth? I offer three points.

Firstly, there are a range of benefits to running a business in the countryside. At a recent ACRE conference ‘why rural matters – the case for investment’, businesses that had established and grown in the countryside or relocated there shared their positive experiences: from awe inspiring landscapes and improved quality of life through to realising being rural is a real asset, giving their brand’s exposure across the world.

This desire to ‘shout loud and proud’ about being in the countryside has led to ‘rockthecotswolds’, a business led initiative celebrating how cool the Cotswolds is and the companies that are there creating, designing and selling goods to a truly global market. At the same time, reductions in public spending have illuminated how rural communities are pioneers in providing local services, overcoming access and delivery difficulties to meet demand. Purple zebra is a social enterprise established by Rural Community Action Nottinghamshire (RCAN) which provides IT services to small and medium sized businesses.

Bedfordshire Rural Communities Charity (BRCC) has established a not-for-profit community vineyard to provide horticultural therapy as well as bringing Ridgmont Station on the Marston Vale line back into productive use as a heritage centre, café and office rental space. In all of these examples the RCC’s have recognised the social value of enterprise. These developments also fit with the emerging perspectives of funders – with the Big Lottery Fund’s ‘your voice, our vision’ consultation calling for residents to have a stake in their community.

Here rural dwellers are not viewed at a disadvantage and in need but are being asked what they want to ‘do’ and what skills they bring in making a funding application. This is part of an approach to move away from funding single interventions to instead forming integrated and collaborative partnerships to solve problems.

Secondly, amid these entrepreneurial businesses and communities there are challenges in living and working in a rural area when compared to locating in an urban area. For RSN readers these are well rehearsed and ongoing: the need to close the ‘digital divide’; where the debate is not just whether ‘speed’ should be prioritised over ‘access’ but finding out from BT (other providers or Local Authorities) where the final 10% are, implementing innovative local solutions to reach the final mile and addressing issues such as cost and affordability.

In practice, some rural businesses have told us that to remain in the countryside they have to spend £6,000-£8,000 a year for adequate connectivity. With the government committed to being ‘digital by default’, in November 2014 the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (EFRA) Select Committee launched an inquiry into broadband coverage and digital only services.

Other challenges include recruiting and retaining qualified staff, for even if you offer excellent pay and conditions your workforce also requires housing, access to services, transport, leisure and entertainment facilities. The availability of parking (for staff and clients); red tape and planning requirements have also been cited.

Thirdly, how do we prepare for the future? It seems all-too-often interventions do not keep up with the pace of change. How can we ‘rural proof’ and ‘future proof’ policy and decision making? Businesses and communities are clearly innovating and developing in the countryside in spite of or as well as any support that is available from government, Local Enterprise Partnerships or Local Authorities.

While there are many good examples of instances where LEPs, UKTI or other bodies have helped rural businesses (to upskill the workforce or export to new markets etc.), often what support is needed falls below their radars. Some businesses have suggested ‘one stop shops’ for start-ups and established firms to can come together around workspace, infrastructure, mentoring, grant funding or to speak to a marketing/HR/legal experts etc.

These are not intended to be ‘talking shops’ but mutually supportive for businesses wanting to thrive in the countryside. With ‘city deals’, combined authorities forming to cooperate in strategic areas such as transport and economic development and support in England for more powers to be devolved to local areas, where is ‘rural’ in some of these debates?

To explore these issues further, the RSN is organising a seminar on ‘local economies’ on 3 December 2014. Hosted by the University of Gloucestershire in Cheltenham, speakers include: Stewart Barr (University of Exeter), Helen Royall (Transition Stroud), Elizabeth Skinner (Society of Local Council Clerks) and a representative from Tewkesbury Borough Council.

Places are limited to 50 and there is a modest charge of £35 plus VAT to cover venue costs, lunch and materials. For more information and to book your place, please contact Bethan at the RSN by email bethan.aldridge@sparse.gov.uk or telephone 01822 813693.

Jessica is a researcher/project manager at Rose Regeneration; an economic development business working with communities, Government and business to help them achieve their full potential.Jessica has undertaken a variety of projects on local economies; including undertaking socio-economic research for the Cotswolds Conservation Board, preparing a rural economy evidence base for Leicester & Leicestershire Enterprise Partnership, and producing rural growth strategies for Mansfield & Ashfield, Gedling, and Breckland & South Holland Councils. More information about the RSN’s work on economy can be found here. Jessica can be contacted by email jessica.sellick@roseregeneration.co.ukor telephone 01522 521211. Website: http://www.roseregeneration.co.uk Twitter: @RoseRegen

Share this post: on Twitter on Facebook

Is rural life so great outdoors? Devolution: a new deal for rural England?

Related Posts

Arctic

Uncategorized

Beyond the ice – what (rural) engagement do we want to have in the ‘High North’? 

Extreme weather

Uncategorized

How can rural communities become more resilient to extreme weather events?

Targets as a public policy tool:  do we need more or less?

Uncategorized

Targets as a public policy tool: do we need more or less?

Sign Up

Jessica Sellick

Popular Posts

  • fragile natureWhat is the ‘nature funding gap’ and how can we bridge it? 
    April 24, 2025
  • Going for [rural] growth – how can regulators make a difference?Going for [rural] growth – how can regulators make a difference?
    March 20, 2025
  • What more can we do to tackle Serious and Organised Crime in rural areas? What more can we do to tackle Serious and Organised Crime in rural areas? 
    February 28, 2025
  • ArcticBeyond the ice – what (rural) engagement do we want to have in the ‘High North’? 
    January 27, 2025
  • bank of englandWhat more can we do to encourage people to make a difference to public life? 
    December 26, 2024

Search

Recent Posts

  • What is the ‘nature funding gap’ and how can we bridge it? 
  • Going for [rural] growth – how can regulators make a difference?
  • What more can we do to tackle Serious and Organised Crime in rural areas? 
  • Beyond the ice – what (rural) engagement do we want to have in the ‘High North’? 
  • What more can we do to encourage people to make a difference to public life? 

Archives

  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
© Jessica's Rural Words 2025
Site by Sivi Luke